ST Labs™ // Open-Source Medical Intelligence

We don't ask for belief.
We provide the ledger.

Photobiomodulation and bio-electric microcurrents/EMS are not beauty trends; they are documented modalities in modern photobiology and physical medicine. Below is our clinical repository — a curated set of peer-reviewed studies, randomized trials, and systematic reviews on the wave frequencies and nanometer outputs that inform the homeskin™ ecosystem.

These studies validate the underlying modalities (red-light photobiomodulation and microcurrent/EMS) in the general scientific literature. They are independent research, not clinical trials of the EyeShield™ device itself.

DESIGN: RCT, split-face YEAR: 2007 COHORT: n = 76 BLINDING: Double-blinded

In a placebo-controlled split-face trial, LED phototherapy reduced wrinkles by up to 36% and increased skin elasticity by up to 19%, with histology showing increased collagen and elastic fibers. The treatment was well tolerated.

View on PubMed
WAVELENGTH: 633 + 830 nm YEAR: 2006 COHORT: n = 36 DESIGN: Multicenter RCT

A multicenter randomized controlled trial reported significant improvement in wrinkles and a softer, smoother, firmer feel after combined 633nm and 830nm LED treatment, with histology showing thicker collagen fibers.

View on PubMed
WAVELENGTH: 633 nm JOURNAL: Int J Mol Med YEAR: 2015 MODEL: In vitro + ex vivo

Continuous 633nm LED irradiation increased type I procollagen and reduced MMP-1 and MMP-2 in skin fibroblasts. It also lowered inflammatory gene expression in keratinocytes and showed no harmful morphology changes in human skin explants.

View on PubMed
WAVELENGTH: 660 nm JOURNAL: J Invest Dermatol YEAR: 2009 MODEL: Reconstructed skin + split-face

Pulsed 660nm LED treatment increased type I procollagen, reduced MMP-1, and improved wrinkle depth and surface roughness in a split-face study. Most participants showed visible improvement after 12 treatments.

View on PubMed
WAVELENGTH: Red + Near-IR YEAR: 2021 MODEL: Fibroblasts + skin explants MARKERS: COL1A1, ELN, ATP

Red plus near-infrared LED treatment increased collagen- and elastin-related gene expression (LOXL1, ELN, COL1A1, COL3A1), raised procollagen type I and elastin protein levels, and increased ATP production in human dermal fibroblasts and skin explants.

View on PubMed
WAVELENGTH: Yellow vs Red YEAR: 2016 MODEL: In vitro + in vivo FOCUS: Photorejuvenation

This comparative study evaluated photorejuvenation from yellow and red LEDs, finding that red LED improved cellular activity and several skin-regeneration markers in both in vitro and in vivo settings.

View Journal
TYPE: Clinical review YEAR: 2021 JOURNAL: Aesthet Surg J SCOPE: LLLT applications

A clinical review summarizing the established applications of low-level light therapy across dermatology and aesthetics, useful as background on the mechanisms and clinical use of photobiomodulation.

View Journal
TYPE: Systematic review YEAR: 2018 SCOPE: Efficacy + safety SOURCE: PMC

A systematic review assessing the efficacy and safety of LED phototherapy across dermatological indications — a strong source-of-record for the overall evidence base behind LED skin treatments.

View on PMC
TYPE: Review YEAR: 2018 SCOPE: LED in dermatology SOURCE: PMC

A foundational review of LED phototherapy in dermatology, covering wavelengths, mechanisms, and clinical context for light-based skin treatment.

View on PMC
REGION: Periorbital YEAR: 2019 DESIGN: Prospective trial SETTING: Self-administered, at-home

This trial found that self-administered periorbital microcurrent/EMS treatment, applied at home, was efficacious in significantly reducing moderate periorbital sinus pain for participants.

View on PubMed
CURRENT: Microcurrent YEAR: 2014 DESIGN: Pilot study FOCUS: Edema clearance

This pilot study reported edema reduction and symptom improvement in patients with lymphedema and/or lipedema of the lower limbs after microcurrent treatment combined with transdermal delivery of active principles.

View on PubMed
CURRENT: Microcurrent YEAR: 2022 MODEL: Preclinical FOCUS: Anti-inflammatory

A preclinical study showing that microcurrent stimulation can suppress inflammatory responses in macrophage models — mechanistic support for the anti-inflammatory effects attributed to bio-electric microcurrent.

View on PMC